Privacy issues with Coronovirus Apps
Virus-Tracing Apps Are Rife With Problems. Governments Are Rushing to Fix Them. NY Times, July 8, 2020
Connecting coronavirus apps and workplaces: what risk does we assume, and when does we assume it, if we download an app required for entering the workplace? Op-Ed: Your college may ask you to sign a waiver for harm inflicted by COVID-19. Don’t do it
In our capitalist society, it’s really about the money, not the people. Tell them schools will open again, work will return to the economic boom as we get back to it, and everything will go back…we just have to figure out: How to get people to actually use contact tracing apps…
Harvard Business Review , July 15, 2020
Early on my library was talking about promoting the Carnegie Mellon contact tracing app to patrons. https://www.novid.org/ In talking with friends, some of them seemed to think that downloading a contact tracing app was the altruistic thing to do in the same vein as wearing masks in public.
- HOW LONG DO WE KEEP YOUR INFORMATION?
When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
The language was so non-committal about retention and loosey-goosey on who actually has access to it. Yuck
I’m going to also go with: Nope.
There’s no mention of if you want your information redacted, whether there is any recourse you can take. Participating does not seem like there is any strong message for securing the info other than storage, yikes!
There also needs to also be discussion around clearly indicating what is meant by
securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
- what is this further processing, do they mean usage?
- deletion is possible is also, too vague!
New research on apps and COVID surveillance technologies:
The global coronavirus pandemic has raised important questions regarding how to balance public health concerns with privacy protections for individual citizens. In this essay, we evaluate contact tracing apps, which have been offered as a technological solution to minimize the spread of COVID-19. We argue that apps such as those built on Google and Apple’s “exposure notification system” should be evaluated in terms of the contextual integrity of information flows; in other words, the appropriateness of sharing health and location data will be contextually dependent on factors such as who will have access to data, as well as the transmission principles underlying data transfer. We also consider the role of prevailing social and political values in this assessment, including the large-scale social benefits that can be obtained through such information sharing. However, caution should be taken in violating contextual integrity, even in the case of a pandemic, because it risks a long-term loss of autonomy and growing function creep for surveillance and monitoring technologies.
Vitak, J., & Zimmer, M. (2020). More Than Just Privacy: Using Contextual Integrity to Evaluate the Long-Term Risks from COVID-19 Surveillance Technologies. Social Media + Society . https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120948250